Groups and committees involved in Reimagine Apply

Reimagine Apply Implementation Advisory Group (RAIAG)

To support the successful implementation and adoption of the new student application system, the Reimagine Apply Implementation Advisory Group (RAIAG) was created and kicked off in September 2025. The Reimagine Apply Steering Committee, which will lead RAIAG, is comprised of representation from the Academic Senate, Admissions & Records, the Board of Governors, CEOs, CISOs, chief instructional officers (CIOs), CSSOs, Financial Aid, the RP Group, the Student Senate, and Wave 1 district leads. The composition of RAIAG consists of functional representation from Admissions & Records, Financial Aid, Institutional Research, Student Services & Support, as well as technology representation (e.g., CISO, IT, programmers, etc.) from participating districts. The RAIAG meets on a weekly basis to prepare for the design, build, and test phases of the implementation.

Steering Committee

  • Oscar Cobian
  • Jennifer Coleman
  • Amy Costa
  • Devin Crosby
  • Victor DeVore
  • Patty Donohue
  • Jory Hadsell
  • Craig Hayward
  • Gerlie Jeltema
  • Lillian Justice
  • Elaine Kuo
  • Luke Lara
  • Carmen Lidz
  • Jane Linder
  • Monika Liu
  • Lisa Mandy
     
  • Rena Martinez Stluka
  • Lynn Neault
  • Michael Odu
  • Oscar Rivera
  • Tina Vasconcellos
  • Alexis Villa
  • Dan Watkins
  • Alexa Zaharris

Reimagine Apply Implementation Advisory Group

  • Christian Alvarado
  • Siliva Corte
  • Joel Diaz
  • Ashley Dunn
  • Caren Fernandez
  • Brandon Hawley
  • Lillian Justice
  • Jennifer Maller
  • Rena Martinez Stluka
  • Amy Meyers
  • Rochelle Morris
  • David Mosley Booze
  • Angelica Munoz
  • Betsy Regalado
  • Gregory Vega
  • Wil Wu
  • Alexa Zaharris
  • Anthony Becerra
  • Chau Dao
  • Renee Garcia
  • Steve Giorgi
  • Martin Gutierrez
  • Ken Lira
  • Korey Lindley
  • Kimberly Korinke
  • Kimberly Reed
  • Greg Ryan
  • Lisa Seals
  • Natosha Susoeff
  • Guillermo Villanueva
  • Daniel Berumen
  • Phil Briggs
  • Jose Carrillo
  • Steven Chan
  • Loris Fagioli
  • Elaine Kuo
  • Pam Mery
  • Marci Mojica
  • Patrick Panelli
  • Maury Pearl
  • David Rothrock
  • Shouka Torabi
  • Breeana Bond
  • Vikki Carr
  • Oscar Cobian
  • Tina Duenas
  • Lillian Garcia
  • Angel Hernandez
  • Meg Hudson
  • Stewart Kimura
  • Elaine Kuo
  • Amy Lee
  • Karissa Morehouse
  • Betsy Regalado
  • Penelope Skaff
  • Ariana Velasco
  • Jeff Blankenship
  • Shawn Bochat
  • Melody Chronister
  • Chris Davis
  • Sonya Horn
  • Gerard Layug
  • Antoine Mehouelley
  • Brad Rippe
  • Albert Saryan
  • Linabel Sajo
  • Benjamin St. Germain
  • Dan Watkins

RFP Review Committee

The RFP Review Committee, comprised of 11 experts representing chief executive officers (CEOs), chief information security officers (CISOs), Admissions & Records, the Student Senate, the RP Group, and chief student services officers (CSSOs), was tasked with evaluating vendors and providing a recommendation to the Chancellor’s Office for a commercial technology vendor to power the new online student application. In February 2025, this group reviewed the vendor submissions from the RFP and determined finalists who presented their solution at in-person vendor demonstrations for the committee. The RFP Review Committee incorporated input from the Extended Committee and recommended a vendor to the Chancellor’s Office.

Extended Committee

The Extended Committee was comprised of ~45 stakeholders from a diverse subsection of districts, equally represented between campus setting (e.g., urban, rural), college size and district type, as well as 10 students, to review and score the finalist vendors selected after the vendor demonstrations. Extended Committee recruitment began in December 2024 and was finalized in mid-January 2025. In late February 2025, the Extended Committee had the opportunity to virtually attend vendor demonstration sessions to evaluate the options for the new Reimagine Apply online application system. The evaluation process continued through March 2025, during which the Extended Committee scored the finalists’ RFP Technical Responses in their areas of expertise (e.g., user experience, accessibility, security/fraud, etc.) and provided input to the RFP Review Committee.